![]() ACDSee produces a "grain" which is coloured. The "grain" is finer and more importantly it is colourless. It was quite a shock to see that my favourite lens has so much chromatic aberration on the ACDSee version of the image because DXO makes the lens look almost perfect Instead of spending 69 for a product that does one thing, you could spend 99 on a product which does many things including noise reduction. ![]() Exposure, sharpness, distortion, chromatic aberration - all has been magically made (almost) perfect. This latter is one of our favourite Lightroom alternatives for photo editing and photo management, and it’s only around 30 more for the full suite. The DXO image produced automatically is obviously better than what I tried to do manually on ACDSee. Yesterday I upgraded to ACDSee Photo Ultimate 2018 so I just did a quick comparison on a couple of D850 images between the ACDSee RAW editor and DXO and checked out the JPG's: ![]() DXO does an excellent job of automatically optimising the image from camera and lens profiles, which leaves me much less work to do on each image. Last year I decided to switch from Lightroom to DXO as RAW Editor. The higher versions of ACDSee have a RAW editor now - but I found that Lightroom was better. I tried Lightroom when it came out and I found it was lacking most of the features that I used in ACDSee. I've been using ACDSee for my image management for décades. What are the differences between the Essential and Elite Edition of DxO PhotoLab This information applies to version (s): 6 DxO PhotoLab is available in two new editions, ESSENTIAL and ELITE, which support the same camera equipment (with exception of Fujifilm X-Trans-Sensors), but offer a different number of features. Anything new on the horizon as far as LR replacements go? Most people just say to check out C1 Pro or DxO.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |